Episode 15 — Run targeted risk analyses that withstand tough scrutiny
Targeted risk analyses support risk-based frequencies and certain requirement options in PCI, and the exam rewards clear, reproducible methods. This episode defines a focused analysis: state the asset and requirement context, identify the specific risk event, enumerate credible threats and vulnerabilities, estimate likelihood and impact using stated scales, and propose a response that meets or exceeds requirement intent. We emphasize traceability—each estimate must be tied to documented sources such as incident data, scans, or change records—and decision points must carry named approvers and dates. You will learn the difference between program-wide enterprise risk methods and the narrow, evidence-rich analyses expected when setting control frequencies or justifying alternatives.
We convert method into examples: selecting an appropriate log review cadence for a low-change, token-only reporting server; setting vulnerability scan windows for an isolated kiosk fleet; or justifying stricter key rotation based on threat changes. Best practices include small, consistent scales; conservative assumptions where uncertainty exists; and storing analyses with the control they inform so auditors can see context. Troubleshooting covers bias (estimates that always land on “low”), stale inputs, and analyses that ignore adjacent risks like third-party changes or shared services. Correct exam answers will feature clear scope statements, documented inputs, reproducible scoring, and outcomes that tie directly to control performance, producing decisions that can be defended months later with the same numbers and artifacts. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
